Analysis a relationship about economic Statistics Project

Examination a relationship about monetary - Statistics Project Example The cash in gracefully and swelling rate is constantly interconnected in light of the fact that a high measure of cash in flexibly for the most part depreciates interest for cash. For example, in a modest community if all occupants were to get $50 raise in their pay every month, in the event that they were paying about $14 on their gas, at that point with the ascent they will probably wouldn't fret paying $15 given the way that it is moderately not as much as what they typically spent on gas every week. As a rule, this is typically how the connection among expansion and cash regularly begins, when the market can manage significant expenses because of increment in the cash gracefully (Mishkin, 40). In this manner, most clients will undoubtedly quit purchasing an item at a similar value it was before the expansion happened basically on the grounds that the purchasing intensity of the cash has been exhausted. The chart above shows the assessed estimation of the connection among swelling and cash development. The pace of expansion relies upon the measure of cash in gracefully. At the point when one mulls over the old style hypothesis, cash doesn't influence genuine factors however affects ostensible factors, for example, expansion. This, along these lines, implies that while plotting the chart, the pace of swelling will be plotted on the y-pivot while the gracefully of cash will be plotted on the x-hub. The blue specks are the real qualities while the red line shows the fitted qualities. Over the long haul, the relationship among's cash and swelling is somewhat high and can be evaluated to very nearly one. Be that as it may, when the momentary period is mulled over, the connection among cash and expansion is fairly feeble which could be a crediting factor regarding why the bend indicating the connection among cash and swelling isn't straight. A few monetary speculations can be applied so as to attempt to clarify the connection between cash gracefully and expansion. If one somehow managed to utilize the amount gracefully hypothesis, likewise alludes to as monetarism, the connection between cash in flexibly and

Divorce and Major Life Change free essay sample

End: because of the above recorded focuses which unequivocally restrict separate, there ought to be changes to make it harder to get a separation. Proposition Divorce: ought to there be changes to make separate from harder? Worries of research: this paper is worried about the impacts of separation and how it influences the general public all in all. It clarifies why separation is fairly negative consequently featuring the antagonistic impacts it has on the general public. Question/Topics to be tended to: 1. What are the reasons for separate? 2. By what method can causes these causes be controlled to stay away from separate? 3. What are the hindrances of separation? 4. Separation is any type of disintegration of a conjugal association (Wikipedia). It can likewise be supposed to be the end of a marriage. It includes the detachment of a couple and withdrawal of any lawful duties which the couples owe one another. It is a common understanding between a couple to isolate because of specific reasons which make them unfit to live with one another. Despite the fact that separation is a legitimate demonstration, it doesn't generally agree with the couple’s feelings. Once in a while, you discover couples separating not on the grounds that they don't adore one another but since of one offense submitted by both of the life partners. Separation is utilized as the path of least resistance when couples can not, at this point live with one another. The method of separation shifts extraordinarily from nation to nation however in many nations there must be a legitimate approval from a court or any related lawful position. Somewhere in the range of 1971 and 2011, practically all the nations legitimized separate from leaving just a couple of nations where separation is still not sanctioned. As indicated by Wikipedia: â€Å"Between 1971 and 2011, five European nations authorized separation: Italy, Spain, Portugal, Ireland and Malta. This leaves only the Philippines as the main nation that doesn't have a common technique for separate. Like each significant life change, separate is distressing. It achieves a great deal of extreme changes to the family in general. It will at that point set aside effort for the family to re-modify into their better approaches forever. For the couple, they figure out how to carry on with an autonomous existence with no help from their accomplice or now and again with help from their accomplices. This factor relies upon the kind of separation and the understanding between the couple. The couples additionally need to figure out how to be single guardians for the situation where kids are included. The kids remain with either accomplice relying upon the shared understanding between the accomplices or care given by court. Separation can be seen from two fundamental methodologies; deficiency based and no-issue based however there are different sorts (Wikipedia). As per Wikipedia, we have the accompanying kinds of separations; No-deficiency separate: this sort of separation doesn't require any charge or evidence of flaw by either accomplice. This kind of separation likewise relies upon the nation. In certain nations, the court just requires an announcement of â€Å"irreversible breakdown† before the separation can be legitimized while in others, an announcement of â€Å"irreconcilable differences† is required. These days, most nations of the world don't rehearse this kind of separation. Wikipedia) Fault separate: this sort of separation has been in presence since 1960. For this situation, for a separation to be authorized, the court requires evidence that one of the accomplices submitted a demonstration incongruent with marriage. These confirmations are called â€Å"grounds† of sepa ration or shortcomings. This sort of separation is drilled by practically all nations of the world. (Wikipedia) Summary separation: this is the sort of separation which is utilized when the accomplices meet qualified necessities or concur on key issues, for example, short marriage, no home loan, no youngsters, etc before the initiation of the marriage. This is just polished in certain nations. (Wikipedia) Uncontested separation: this sort of separation happens when the accomplices can go to a concurrence with or without legal counselors about their property, youngsters and bolster issues. On the off chance that the accomplices have a reasonable understanding, they would then be able to give the court it and their separation will be sanctioned and if not, it is dependent upon the court to choose how they will share everything. (Wikipedia) Collaborative separation: this is a case whereby there is an understanding between companions to head out in their own direction which would require a lawyer to be available. In this kind of separation the mates don't really isolate on account of differences, but since they chose to head out in their own direction. Intervened separate: this is a conventional sort of separation wherein an arbiter encourages the two gatherings to convey and gives data. Toward the finish of the intervention procedure, they go to an understanding which they present to the court. (Wikipedia) Nowadays, the level at which individuals get separated is uncontrolled and it is expanding every day. There are different reasons which lead individuals to get separates however some probably won't be sufficiently legitimate. The significant family issues which lead to separate include: infidelity, absence of correspondence, youthful relationships. (Pansen) Adultery: this is when both of the life partners undermines each other with an alternate individual. It can likewise be when both of the companions is occupied with extramarital undertakings. This an intense offense in a marriage on the grounds that by submitting infidelity, you are undermining everything both of you have placed into the marriage. Lion's share of relationships where infidelity was submitted prompts separate since it leaves the accomplices feeling deceived. Pansen) Lack of correspondence: as per Sonel Pansen: â€Å"Lack of correspondence is one of the main sources of separation. A marriage is on the rocks when the lines of correspondence fall flat. † as of late, a ton of families face monetary issues and this makes mates work for longer hours and henceforth leaves them with next to zero chance to speak with one another. Because o f this, the accomplices don't talk about their issues or search for answers for their issues. Little issues which could have been settled amass into gigantic issues at long last bringing about separation. Pansen) Young relationships: as individuals consistently state; â€Å"young relationships don't last†. This announcement is exceptionally obvious in light of the fact that most youthful relationships are hurried into. The accomplices at youthful ages feel they are â€Å"in love† which causes them to feel powerful. By then, they don't think straight and feel marriage is the following stage. This denies the couple of becoming more acquainted with one another. The majority of these relationships end up in lament which prompts separate. (Pansen) People who experience separate are incredibly influenced by it and lion's share of the occasions, the impacts are somewhat contrary. Separation isn't in any capacity fitting. It realizes enthusiastic shakiness, misery, broken homes, absence of solidarity. The main time when separation ought to be considered is if the couple can no longer endure one another and they may make hurt each other. Despite the fact that these are the general impacts of separation, separate effectsly affects the various individuals from the family and the general public all in all. The impacts of separation can be partitioned into the consequences for youngsters, consequences for the couple and the impacts on the general public. The impacts of separation on kids The separation of a couple realizes such a great amount of worry to their youngsters. It leaves the kids with the issues of acclimating to another life. Separation normally achieves unsteadiness and misery to the youngsters. More often than not, the kids escape from either parent contingent upon the parent who has guardianship over the kids. The youngsters additionally have a high inclination of having a diminished way of life since they don't have the two guardians to think about them. The youngsters may have isolated lives in situations where they live with the two guardians and this creates a great deal of turmoil for the kids since they attempt to adjust both ways of life. Separation likewise makes the kids exposed more obligations in light of the fact that a messed up home doesn't give them the consideration they require (Foulkes). Youngsters from separated from homes typically will in general develop mentally excessively quick or act more seasoned than their age and this may lead the kids off track. Some of the time, separation can realize youngster misuse particularly in circumstances where their folks remarry. As indicated by analysts, the impact separate has on youngsters to a great extent relies upon their sexual orientation. Female youngsters influenced by separate from will in general be explicitly mishandled because of absence of parental mindfulness or diminished parental mindfulness. (Johnson). Young ladies from separate from homes will in general participate in sexual exercises at prior ages subsequently prompting high school pregnancies. A great deal of female youngsters likewise become wanderers since they believe they are not getting enough consideration. These young ladies who flee wind up undermining or taking part in drugs since they have no direction. Male kids then again will in general be increasingly forceful and rebellious (Foulkes). They will in general pull back from their folks. They reprimand themselves for their parents’ separate. Young men will in general go enjoy negative acts, for example, drinking, smoking, burglary. They likewise experience the ill effects of wretchedness. The impacts of separation on couples The impact of separation on couples is pulverizing in light of the fact that during marriage, couples figure out how to live with one another and supplement one another and when they get separated, it is normally difficult for them to modify. They need to acknowledge the reality they would not have their accomplice there for them any longer. Separation is an upsetting procedure to couples; it achieves tension to the two gatherings. Separation influences couples socially, monetarily, financially and from various perspectives. Socially, in light of the fact that they may no longer get along or feel great with one another, they bring about having various companions or in any event, changing their ways of life. Financially, there are a ton of issues. They are confronted with the issues of parting properties (Gac). Despite the fact that separation influences the couple all in all, its impacts are somewhat unique on the male and female

Dementia Nursing and Amp Essay

Dementia Nursing and Amp Essay Dementia: Nursing and Amp Essay It has been very much archived that the maturing populace is on the expansion in Australia and because of these forecasts so too is the interest on the intense consideration setting (Australia Institute of Health and Welfare [AIHW], 2007). Dementia is portrayed as a disorder, as a rule of a constant or dynamic nature, brought about by an assortment of cerebrum ailments that influence memory, conduct and capacity to perform ordinary exercises (World Health Organization [WHO], 2012, p.2). Reason: The motivation behind this writing audit was to set up if the conveyance of nursing care in the intense consideration setting, incorporates the more seasoned individual with a Dementia analysis, utilizing proof based nursing intercessions, for example, individual focused consideration. Foundation: In spite of the fact that Dementia isn't a piece of ordinary maturing (WHO, 2012) there is a high rate of determination in the more seasoned individual. The maturing populace will affect the requests of the social insurance setting, and medicinal services laborers require specific abilities to give ideal consideration that is proper when a more seasoned individual enters the intense consideration field. Technique: At first the quest question utilized for this audit was can medical caretakers recognize triggers of exacerbated conduct's utilizing an approved instrument? This inquiry was discarded because of the absence of writing and refined to the more extensive setting question of does nursing care of the individual with dementia in the intense setting incorporate proof based practice, and how is individual focused consideration actualized. The information bases looked were from The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, bar Med, Joanna Briggs Institute and Gray Literature. The writing utilized in this audit was distributed somewhere in the range of 2003 and 2012. Writing sources were looked from peer surveyed diaries, government distributions, and the web. Catchphrases Searched: Dementia, intense consideration, proof based work on, nursing points of view, social and mental side effects of dementia, individual focused consideration. Results: The writing survey generally noticed that dementia care in the intense setting is missing, and that further accentuation on adaption of information interpretation identified with proof based practice is required. The basic subjects determined found that nursing staff in the intense consideration setting legitimized that absence of time to give individual focused consideration was the fundamental explanation behind exclusion. Ward culture, understanding and mentalities affected clinical dynamic of nursing staff in the intense setting, and the investigations audited showed that the requirements of the medical caretaker was organized over the individual with dementia, in this way individual focused consideration is generally not given in the intense setting (Bolster Manias, 2010; Borbasi, Jones, Lockwood, Emden, 2006; (Cowdell, 2010). In the event that attendants were outfitted with the experience to help the individual with dementia this would ease the keenness of the apparent remainin g burden of the medical attendant. This audit anyway likewise uncovered that medical attendants had an inspirational mentality to grasp confirm based practice (Bolster Manias, 2010). Execution of the forte needs of the individual with dementia into the enlisted nurture graduate projects or on direction to the intense ward setting utilizing the train the mentor model (Alzheimers' Australia, 2011) would be gainful. Acquaintance Due with the maturing populace, current patterns in Australia and universally, anticipate expanding care of the more established individual with dementia, evaluating a dementia determination will extraordinarily increment in the following two decades (Department of Health and Aging [DoHA], 2012). The pervasiveness of dementia in the more seasoned individual is expanding and ...is assessed at 35.6 million worldwide and is anticipated to twofold every 20 years..with another analysis at regular intervals (WHO, 2012, p.2). More established individuals are bound to be conceded into the intense consideration setting (Edvardsson Nay, 2011) so too are those with dementia (Cowdell, 2010), and the probability of complex needs will build the danger of unfriendly effects for this populated gathering

Research report Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words - 4

Report - Research Paper Example These endeavors of ennrching client bits of knowledge are profoundly unique across various stores all through the world (Marks and Spencer plc, 2015). Relevantly, the ebb and flow investigate requests for an investigation of client bits of knowledge into an association, where M&S has been proposed. The explanation for choosing M&S as the association for the examination is the division which it has a place with, for example retailing. The exploration of the retail division would give better results than the examination, as a wide assortment of clients show up at retail outlets. The retail division likewise has a higher number of buyers when contrasted with some other industry all through the world. Also, it is prominent that the customers invest a critical extent of energy in retail outlets when contrasted with different outlets. In this manner, it is significant from the point of view of an analyst to choose retail outlets for understanding customer experiences to a huge degree (Marks and Spencer plc, 2015). The prime point of the proposed examine is to comprehend customer bits of knowledge in M&S. In such manner, for achieving the point of the exploration, it is basic to draw a portion of the examination targets for the investigation. The examination goals are recorded underneath. For the powerful fulfillment of the investigation, it is imperative to set a portion of the examination questions. In such manner, it is exceptionally significant that the examination questions are applicable to the destinations and point of the investigation. These examination questions are recorded underneath. The proposed examination includes a one of a kind and conclusive research plan, which would altogether bolster the general improvement of the investigation and the compelling fulfillment of the equivalent. In such manner, the relationship between's the various factors would be executed (Baker, 2004). In such manner, the factors are chosen dependent on the examination inquiries of the investigation, which are recorded previously. Additionally, it is eminent that the connection procedure would be

Sample essay of writing the conclusion about film

Sample essay of writing the conclusion about film Sample Paper: Conclusion About Film Background Information Crash is a 2005 film done by director Haggis, p. Most people would wonder what kind of a movie is “Crash” but the fact remains that it has been flourishing trailer over the past years since it was released. In this movie, several American people from diverse origins are brought together through a grim serendipity, which forces them or else the entire audience to realize their important connectedness. In ritzy LA neighborhood, black men move from a restaurant while complaining about the services they have received. The characters include Anthony (Ludacris) who bombastically argues that a server had granted coffee refilling to the white patrons while neglecting him and his friend, Peter (Larenz Tate). They continue to walk down street and a white couple tends to pass them. The woman takes the hand of her spouse as they walk, as she fears some black men. Anthony realizes that they move closer to each other in great fear and suggests that no white person can walk brave along the stre ets without fear. They go on to carjack the white couple while they get nearer to the navigator. The movie has also two main characters who are Ryan and Christine who seem to direct the entire theme in their relationship. Ryan appears as a hero who works as a police officer and is focused to reduce racial conflicts in the district. In other words, the movie revolves around these two main characters although there are several others that clearly bring a theme of discussion. In this case, both argue over racial conflicts. There appears to be racial conflicts throughout the movie. At the first scene of the movie, two characters (Matt Dillon and Ryan Phillippe) as they pull over a black American couple (Terrace Howard and Thandie Newton). When Matt Dillon realizes that they are black, he orders them to get out of a vehicle though they are innocent. This is because in his earlier days, he engaged in a heated debate with an insurance company following death of his father and is assisted by a black man. In this case, he feels discouraged as well as mistreated and this makes him react a gainst the black couple. Sociological Perspective of the Film As observed in the introductory points above, conflict appears to be the major theme or else the main sociological perspective. In this case, racial conflicts are clearly depicted in the movie. Conflict occurs between the social constructs and the inborn traits of the characters in the movie. In this case, race as well as gender cannot be depicted as physical attributes. The entire movie illustrates the district attorney of Los Angeles as he struggles in order to salvage the public reputation amongst the black voters through looking for an African-American that he can reward in public. In this case, he tends to consider a black man that had performed his duty in a heroic way. However, a person mentions in the background that he is an Iraqi. Another suggests that the man looks black. This is an illustration that there are racial conflicts among the people due to their cultures or else national heritages. Moreover, a detective appears in another scene and calls his lover a Mexican but she responds by saying that none of them is Mexican. From this explanation, it is clear that the main theme being depicted in the film is conflict regarding sociological perspectives. There appear several racial conflicts in the movie such as the one between Michael Penas and Sandra Bullocks. When Michael Penas comes to Bullock’s room in order to fix her lock, she looks at him and notices his tattoos and the way he fits in baggy trousers. She discovers that Michael may belong to a robbery gang and would sell her keys to thieves. However, Michael appears to be a serious family man who is around trying to fix life for his daughter. The issue of racial conflict in this movie revolves around both male and female characters. Culture in the United States Depicted in the Movie The values being depicted in this film include gender roles from a traditional perspective as well as from a modern perspective, faith, hope as well as love are also being illustrated clearly and the ability of the people to solve conflicts among themselves. The movie clearly brings out the issue of racism between the black and white Americans. These appear to be the main cultures in the United States. Their cultures as well as beliefs tend to conflict with each other in that one race looks down on the other. Regarding the traditional gender roles depicted in the movie, it is clear that rigid roles of gender have great influence on people’s connections. In the traditional roles of male as providers or else protectors, the movie clearly brings out the issue of gender roles but on a conflicting ground between the black and white Americans. In one of the scenes, there Cameron is pulled by John Ryan who is a racist police officer. Cameron is with his wife and soon starts to antagonize the officer and refuses to comply. They are then checked for any weapons and when Cameron picks the order without making any aggression, John frisks the wife in a sexual way. The wife perceives the husband as a less protector for not protecting her at this scene. She later continues to make him realize his inadequacy as a man and their marriage is in danger. While rethinking about the gender roles in the American community, it is important to realize the diversity of traits between men such as aggression, decisiveness, intuition as well as non-aggression. The movie goes on to illustrate a Persian-American owner of a shop who tends to acquire a gun in order to protect his wife as well as his daughter. Dori who is his daughter perceives this as an inferior act by his father. In other words, culture regarding the gender roles has been greatly illustrated in the entire movie. Moreover, faith, hope and love have been depicted. In this case, conflict appears in a reverse of gender roles when a little girl acts as a protector to her father. The cloak imagined by the girl depicts faith as well as hope to the little girl to protect her father from the assailant. Socialization There appears a wealthy as well as a light-skinned woman whose name is Christine who clings to a comforting police officer, Ryan. In her wedding, her face appears to be that of distress, grief or else shock. Their embrace appears to be intimate and almost erotic, as they seem to be on a verge of kissing. On his side, Ryan appears to be slightly guarded with a mask of determination and heroism. Ryan drugs a woman out of the burning and overturned car by risking his own life despite the other officers’ attempts to pull him off. This depicts Ryan’s heroism trait. The entire act of heroism represent an instance of racial reconciliation that turns out to be climactic or else unforgettable moment in the movie. In this case, Ryan appears to be an ideal man who is ready for societal development rather than discrimination due to racial conflicts in the United States. Moreover, there seems to be a political message been driven by the movie. When the attorney of the district in Los Angeles tries to offer a reward to an African- American, some people complain that he is a black man indicating that the white believe that they are superior to the black. This is a reward for the black people having participated in the voting exercise. However, it appears that the white people are not so much appreciative to the black Americans hence indicating discrimination on political grounds. The attorney in Los Angeles is trying to unite the people but there appears to be challenges in their differences. The major agents of socialization depicted in this movie appear to be family and peers. Family is clearly depicted as a socialization ground where most families are illustrated from different races. It appears that the white prefer marrying their white fellow women while the black prefer marrying their fellow black women. The family interactions in the film can be seen in the white couples who are carjacked by Anthony and Peter. Moreover, peer socialization appears evident in that most characters’ behaviors are influenced by their friends. For example, Peter and Anthony appear to stick together in various activities.

Insurance underwriters in the UK - Free Essay Example

Title: Evaluate the extent to which the slip may serve to affect the practice of the London insurance market when it is not 100% subscribed by the underwriters, so as to determine how they can avoid issues that arise from insurance contracts on this basis, with a view to determining whether there is scope for reform. Abstract In this dissertation, the author will examine the various practical and legal mechanisms currently available to insurance underwriters in England and Wales to protect themselves from the risks associated with under-subscribed slips, i.e. slips which have not been 100% underwritten. Examining international examples of circumstances which have given rise to, or could potentially give rise to an increase in these risks, and evaluating the extent to which the current framework provides adequate mechanisms to protect insurance underwriters in these circumstances, the author will build a solid case for the reform of the law in this area. The primary methodology of this research dissertation will take the form of a literature review. Sources have been selected on the basis of their relevance to the issues at hand, and comprise both secondary sources, in particular journal articles from eminent authors in this area, and primary case law. The author has imposed no significantly rigid jurisdictional limits upon his source selection criteria, the circumstances giving rise to the problems resulting from under-subscribed slips, in the main, existing as international phenomena. It should be noted however that conclusions of this dissertation concern the London insurance m arket and the law of England only, and have no further external validity. Introduction The Insurance Process: An Overview The diagram overleaf represents an overview of the insurance process. The role of the slip and the relationship between insured clients, Lloyds brokers, the Lloyds of London Insurance Market, the Leading Name and the Names of Lloyds of London can all be derived from it. Marked in RED is where the problem of under-subscription may arise within the process. The unsigned slip is a paper prepared by the Lloyds broker which describes the risk that their client wishes to have insured[1]. The slip is then passed to a leading underwriter of Lloyds of London Insurance Market, selected by the broker usually on the basis of his particular area of expertise. The leading underwriter manages a syndicate of Lloyds Names. Upon receiving the slip, the leading underwriter will decide whether or not to offer the risk to his syndicate. If he does decide to offer the risk, then he will take instructions from his Names as to the proportion of the risk that are each willing to underwrite, I.e. provide security against in return for a proportion of the premium paid by the insured client. If he is unable to persuade his Names to underwrite 100% of the slip, then he will pass the slip to other Lloyds underwriters, whos respective Names may or may not choose to subscribe for all or part of the remaining risk. Again, if a Name does decide to subscribe he or she must complete the appropriate entries upon the slip and provide his or her signature, at which point he or she will be deemed to have entered into a contract with the leading underwriter to assume a defined proportion of the insurable risk described by the slip. There is no guarantee that 100% of the risk will be undersigned by Names of Lloyds: In the case that, despite trying hard to acquire insurance, less than 100% of the slip is subscribed, the broker is likely to inform their client that it will not be possible to insure 100% of the risk. The client will then be in a position to decide whether or not to proceed with partial insurance[2]. There are some legal problems which can arise from this type of under subscription, although these relate to cancellation rights and are merely academic, it being customary practice to allow parties to walk away from any agreements before the slip is 100% subscribed[3]. The type of under subscription with which this research dissertation is primarily concerned actually results from over subscription by Lloyds insurance brokers: It is common practice for brokers to oversubscribe their slips. For example, a broker may secure 200% of the potential capital provision via different underwriters. Before the insurance policy can be constituted, it is therefore necessary to sign-down the risk allocations/ capital provisions of the various insurers so that, in total, only 100% of the risk is insured. For example, if a broker allocates 200% o f a risk from two underwriters in equal proportions, before the insurance policy can be drafted it will be necessary to reduce each of the underwriters risk holdings by 50%, so that only 100% of the risk is insured in total. Insurers know that over subscription of slips by Lloyds brokers is common practice and as a result, before making an offer to underwrite a part of the risk, they will usually ask the broker to confirm the likely sign-down percentage. In our example above, the broker should inform each underwriter that their offers are likely to be signed-down by 50%, and it will likely be for this reason that each underwriter then offers to insure 100% of the risk. In fact, by making an offer of 100% on the slip, the underwriters actually expect to only be liable for 50% of the risk. If a claim is made before the sign-down has occurred, then the slip is essentially under subscribed because, even if prima facie 100% of the risk described by the slip has been allocated, those insu rers were not expecting to be bound to insure 100% of the risk between them, but rather a reduced signed-down proportion of that risk. The problems arising from this situation and the available practical and legal solutions will form the subject-matter of this research dissertation. Another way that under subscription can effectively occur is when the client is not made aware of the correct terms of the insurance or reinsurance, e.g. where an insurance broker erroneously informs an insurer that reinsurance has been secured upon the same terms as the original insurance. In these circumstances, one might argue that even though all parties to the insurance policy may believe that the slip is 100% subscribed, due to a failure of the broker to ensure that all parties know that the terms of the reinsurance are different to those of the original insurance, there is a marked discrepancy between the level of insurance expected, and the level of reinsurance actually provided. For exampl e, in the case of Youell v Bland Welch Co Ltd (No 2) (The Superhulls Cover case) [1990] 2 Lloyds Rep 431 the brokers were asked to obtain reinsurance in respect of construction risks on three new building vessels via Lloyds of London upon the same terms as the original insurance. The brokers contacted the insurers and informed them that they had found an underwriter willing to provide reinsurance as original. However, as it transpired, the brokers had made an error- the terms of the reinsurance were very different to the original terms of insurance, containing a 48 month cut-off clause. The insurers argued, quite reasonably, that had they known of the terms of the reinsurance, they would not have chosen to accept it. In this case, Phillips J, who handed down the leading judgement, held that the brokers had breached their duty of care towards their client, both in contract and also in tort. He declared that, in such cases, the level of damages available can be calculated as: à ¢Ã¢â €š ¬Ã…“the difference between the amount for which the insurers became liable on the original insurance, and the amount for which they would have been liable if they had written reduced lines.[4]à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  As we will see in chapter 1 of this paper, the law pertaining to when an insurer may avoid a policy due to a misrepresentation having been made is highly complex and has recently been subject to judicial reform. The Structure of This Paper The remainder of this paper will be structured according to the following headings. Under each heading is provided a short summary of the purpose of that section: Chapter 1 à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" The Laws Development In this chapter we will perform an historical analysis of the development of the law in regard to the regulation of the behaviour of the parties to insurance slips and insurance contracts, and their respective rights and liabilities under such agreements. This analysis will be limited to the law relevant to insuran ce contracts where the relevant slips have not been 100% subscribed, either because the broker has not managed to secure his desired level of subscription or because insurers decide to un-subscribe due to a misrepresentation either made to them directly or made to the leading underwriter but followed by them. Chapter 2 à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" Problems for Parties to Insurance Contracts In this chapter we will examine the problems for parties to insurance contracts which may arise as a result of under-subscribed slips. In this chapter, the legal analysis discussed in the preceding chapter will be referred to in order to evaluate the extent to which the current legal regime is capable of mitigating the problems identified. In this Chapter we will also analyse the role of the Financial Ombudsman Service in enforcing insurance slips. Chapter 3 à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" Recommendations Reflections on Scope for Reforms Building upon the conclusions reached in the previous chapter in rega rds to the adequacy of the existing regulatory regime to mitigate the problems associated with under-subscribed slips, in this chapter, we will assess to what extent reform of the current legal framework is (i) necessary, and (ii) desirable. Throughout this chapter, impact-assessments will be performed in regards to the likely effects, both positive and negative, of implementing any suggested reforms. Conclusion à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" Summary of Discussion In this section, we will draw together the conclusions from chapters 1, 2 and 3 and provide a summary of the overall conclusions of this research dissertation. Each conclusion will be accompanied by key recommendations for reform, where appropriate. Within this section, we will also evaluate the scope for further research into any of the issues raised within this paper or any other relevant issues. Chapter 1: The Laws Development Historically, Lloyds brokers, underwriters and Names were regulated by the Lloyds Acts of 1871 , 1888 and 1925 and the Lloyds Signal Stations Act of 1988. However, these Acts have since been repealed. The current regulatory framework is provided by the Financial Services Authority, which was given full competence in this regard by the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. However, the majority of insurance related disputes which reach the Courts are decided either on the basis of contract law, where a contract exists between the aggrieved parties and the terms of that contract are relevant to the dispute in question or, on a tortious basis, where one party alleges that loss has been suffered as a result of a breach of the duty of care of the other party. Often, claims will be brought initially on both bases, although claimants notoriously prefer to rely upon contractual arguments, as the rules pertaining to remoteness of damage are less stringent. Within the context of under subscribed slips, the Courts have held that brokers may be deemed to owe a contractual duty t o certain parties even though, strictly speaking, no contractual agreement between these parties was ever constituted. One such example is the case of London Borough of Bromley v Ellis [1977] 1 Lloyds Rep 97 (à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“The London Borough of Bromley caseà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ). In brief, the facts of this case were as follows: An insurance agent agreed to arrange the transfer of an insurance policy to Mr. Ellis, free of charge. In this respect no contract can be deemed to have existed between the insurance agent and Mr. Ellis, for lack of valuable consideration. Mr. Ellis presumed that the insurance had been transferred by the insurance agent, but in fact it had not been. Upon making a claim with the insurers, Mr. Ellis discovered that the insurance agent had failed to transfer the insurance policy into his name. Mr. Ellis brought an indemnity claim against the insurance agent. The Court of Appeal acknowledged that no contractual agreement existed between the insurance agent and Mr. Ellis but, nevertheless, awarded reliance damages in favour of Mr. Ellis. In regard to this decision, Kortmann (2001) at V.4.2 writes: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“The Court of Appeal held that even though there was no contractual relationship between Mr Ellis and the insurance agent, the latters undertaking gave rise to a duty to arrange the transfer with reasonable care. If this duty were merely to take care that his undertaking did not end up putting Mr Ellis in a worse position than he was before the undertaking was made, one would have expected the average charge of an insurance agent to be a reducing factor in the assessment of damages. However, nothing in the case report indicates that such reduction was made.à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  It would therefore seem that the Courts are willing to offer contractual remedies against insurance agents even where no contract has in fact been entered into. This conclusion is supported by the case of General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation and Others v Tanter and Others (à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“The Zephyr case). In this case, an insurance broker was asked, by a shipowner, to provide an all risks policy to insure a ship which he wished to purchase. Because insurers of all risks usually wish to reinsure some of the total loss risk, the broker approached several all risk underwriters (to provide the shipowner with insurance cover) and also some total loss underwriters (to provide the prospective all risk insurers with total loss insurance cover). For present purposes, the particulars of the dispute which arose in this case are irrelevant[5]. What is relevant is Courts interpretation of the relationship between the broker and the client, the broker and the primary (all risk) underwriters and the broker and the secondary (total loss risk) underwriters. An eloquent summary of the final decision of the Court of Appeal is provided by Westgarth (1985) pp 42-3: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“It was held that the broker was agent for the insured in respect of the primary insurance and agent for certain underwriters of the primary insurance in respect of the reinsurance. He was not the agent of the reinsurance underwriters. [Despite this relational analysis] [i]t was held by Hobhouse J that the broker was liable to the reinsurance underwriters notwithstanding that he was not their agent.à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  It would seem that the Courts are willing to infer a duty of care between parties to the insurance process, even where, strictly speaking, no contractual duty can be said to exist, although as we shall see shortly, this decision was overturned by the Court of Appeal[6]. With this in mind, let us now turn to examine how the Courts have traditionally dealt with the problems arising from under-subscribed slips: In the Zephyr case, within a fortnight of the underwriters signing the slip, the insured ship became damaged in a weather storm and was declared a write-off. The insured client submitted a claim with the primary all risk underwriters who in turn submitted an indemnity claim to the secondary total los s underwriters. However, the total loss underwriters repudiated the claim on the basis that they claimed to have been given a representation by the broker that the slip would be signed-down and in any event, had been led to believe through previous dealing with the broker in question that this would be the case, him being renowned for over subscribing his slips. In other words, the total loss insurers had never been prepared to be liable to the full extent of their written line. Hobhouse J provided an eloquent solution to the problem, one which would allow the insured shipowner to recover his losses immediately, and the total loss insurers to reclaim that part of the settlement which they had never expected to be liable for: He held that the all risk insurers were liable to the insured shipowner, but that they were entitled to be indemnified in full by the total loss insurers who were liable to the full extent of their written line. However, he declared that the total loss insure rs were entitled to bring an action against the broker to recover damages on the grounds that the broker was in breach of an assumpsit duty which arose as a result of the signing-down indication. As we have seen earlier in this chapter, even though Hobhouse J conceded that the broker was not an agent of the reinsurers (the total loss insurers), he held that the broker owed a duty of care to these insurers. The rationale for this decision was as follows: Because the broker, either expressly by direct representation or impliedly through previous trading behaviour, had led the reinsurers to believe that the slip would be over-subscribed and therefore subject to a signing-down process, the broker had a duty to exercise all professional skill in ensuring that he managed to over subscribe the slip, so as it would be possible to sign-down by the indicated proportion. The brokers appealed this decision, arguing that they did not owe the total loss insurers any duty of care as they were n ot in fact agents of these insurers and they had not in fact made any representations that the reinsurance slip would be signed down. They conceded that they had made such a representation to the leading underwriter of the all risk insurance, but argued vehemently that the secondary total loss underwriters should not have thought to infer from this indirect representation that the reinsurance slip would also be signed-down. Mustill JL agreed that the signing indication made to the primary underwriter and his syndicate should be deemed to form part of the contractual bargain. However, he found nothing within terms of that indication to suggest that anyone other than the primary all risk underwriter and his syndicate of Names could also rely upon that representation. Oliver and Brown LLJ agreed with the reasoning of Mustill LJ in this matter, and as such the original decision of Hobhouse J was set-aside. The broker won the appeal and as such the total loss insurers were not entitle d to recover damages. On top of this, the Court of Appeal refused leave for the reinsurers to appeal. Under this reasoning, unless a broker makes a signing indication to the secondary underwriters directly, then the secondary underwriters will not be able to rely upon such a representation even when they know that such a representation has been made to other underwriters involved in the insurance in question. This decision was heavily criticized for failing to take account of the fact that, in practice, secondary underwriters often make their decisions to insure based upon the fact that a particular lead underwriter has accepted the insurance. As Longmore (2001) at 19 writes: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“[T]here is the difficulty that the requirement of inducement can be a little inconvenient if there is a long list of insurers on, for example, the slip. The reality is that later subscribers to the slip will have been induced not so much by the non-disclosure or misrepresentation as such but by the fact that one or more leading underwriters have written the risk, themselves no doubt induced by the non-disclosure or misrepresentation as the case may be. Here there may well be scope for a useful reform of the law to say that a following underwriter will be presumed to be induced by any non-disclosure or misrepresentation made to a leading underwriter.à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  While Longmores criticism is logically sound, one might argue that reform is unnecessary because the law of contractual misrepresentation already provides a remedy to a 3rd party who has been induced into a contract by an indirect misrepresentation: For example, in the case of Pilmore v Hood (1838) 5 Bing NC 97 as recently affirmed by the Court of Appeal in the case of Clef Aquitaine SARL v. Laporte Materials (Barrow) Ltd [2000] 2 All ER 493 it was held that where A makes a misrepresentation to B, knowing that C is likely to be privy to the terms of this misrepresentation and also be induced by it, then A m ay be liable to C if C does in fact rely upon the misrepresentation as a material inducement. One might ask, if this remedy already exists, why it was not applied by Mustill LJ in the appeal of the Zephyr case. The answer is that there was no indication in this case that the brokers representation to the primary underwriter was of a kind which could be relied upon by any other party. If the misrepresentation has concerned a fact regarding the state of repair of the insured ship, then no doubt the Court would have allowed the reinsurers to claim against the broker. However, the misrepresentation in the Zephyr case was an indication that the broker would sign-down the all risk insurance- no reasonable person would consider the terms of this representation to extend to a different insurance slip automatically. Therefore, if Sir Longmores suggestion of reform was adopted, it might serve to undermine hundreds of years of carefully considered and incrementally developed jurisprudence! This is not the only reason why reform of the law here might be considered unnecessary- there are simple practical ways in which underwriters could avoid this problem: For example, the problem could be avoided if underwriters, regardless of their position within the insurance chain, consistently made a concerted effort to include, within the terms of their insurance offers to brokers, a clause stating that their offers are made upon the understanding that any representations made by the broker to any other underwriters will be deemed applicable to them also. Likewise, underwriters could simply ask brokers to confirm likely sign-down rates before they subscribe to the slip[7]. The author understands that the insurance trading floor is a high pressured environment where quick decisions must be made, but he can see no reason why introducing these simple practical initiatives would significantly undermine the efficiency of the overall process, taking into account the benefits that such a reform would bring. We will address these suggestions for reform in more detail within chapter 3 of this paper, where we will also assess the possibility of introducing a reform which precludes brokers from over subscribing insurance slips in the first place! Before we move on to discuss other case law decisions relevant to this problem, let us consider how the doctrine of misrepresentation by conduct might be relevant: It has been settled at law that representations inferred from a persons conduct can amount to actionable misrepresentations. For example, in the case of Spice Girls Ltd v Aprilia World Service Bv [2002] EWCA Civ 1 5 it was deemed that the Spice Girls had made a misrepresentation that Geri Halliwell would be remaining with the group for the foreseeable future by allowing her to appear in promotional material even though they all knew that she was about to leave the group. The question is whether or not this principle can be invoked where a particular broker is kn own in the industry to always engage in over subscription of insurance slips, I.e. can an insurer rely upon a brokers previous conduct to bring a claim against a broker who fails to sign-down on a particular occasion. While Hobhouse J in the Zephyr case argued that the reinsurers were entitled to bring a claim for damages on this basis, if one takes a strict contractual viewpoint it is very difficult to argue that this is the case, unless the broker always over subscribed his slips by the same amount. This was not the case in the Zephyr case: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“It was well known to the market and well known to the particular underwriter that the brokers method of broking was to procure a heavy over subscription of the slips, often three or four times oversubscribed, so that they signed down. Also, he found that the identity of the particular underwriter and his syndicate that had signed the slip prior to him enabled him to assume that an indication of not more than one-third had been g iven to the preceding underwriter.à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  One might argue that because of the circumstances surrounding the insurance in this case and also the previous conduct of the particular broker in question, the reinsurers were led to believe (i) that the broker would sign-down the slips to some degree; and (ii) that he would not sign-down by more than one-third, and therefore that they should be entitled to reclaim some of their losses from the broker for failing to sign-down the slip at all. However, this author would argue that the terms of this indirect representation are so uncertain that no reasonable person should have allowed themselves to be induced by it. It is also difficult to argue that such a representation could be a material[8] inducement- it is unlikely that an underwriters decision to underwrite a slip would ever be based materially upon the brokers agreement to sign-down, even where such an agreement has been expressly made. While it may be true that courts have na rrowed the definition of materiality and expanded the concept of inducement[9], within this context, I would still argue that the misrepresentation by conduct route to remedy is a weak one, unless it can be shown that the broker always over-subscribes by the same percentage and that this is common market knowledge. In England, this debate is now somewhat academic. After all, in the recent cases of Aneco Reinsurance Underwriting Ltd v Johnson Higgins [1998] 1 Lloyds Rep. 565 and International Lottery Management Ltd v Dumas [2002] Lloyds Rep IR 237 it has been made clear that the Courts may be prepared to find that a misrepresentation made by a broker to a leading underwriter is also a misrepresentation made by the broker to the following underwriters, even where there was no direct representation made by the broker to these insurers. In both of these cases, the Courts held that following underwriters were entitled to avoid policies on the basis of misrepresentations which were ma de to the leading underwriters only. Merkin (2006) provides a useful summary of the two schools of reasoning which have been proferred to justify this somewhat artificial position: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“The reasoning [is] variously that it was understood by the market that the followers would rely on the leader or that if a false statement is made to the leader there is an obligation to disclose it to the followers.[10]à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  Merkin (2006) has criticized the latter of these two arguments on the basis that it can only apply where the broker making the false statement knew that his statement was false: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“An argument which can be right only if the broker making the false statement was aware that he had done so, given that a broker is not required to disclose what he does not know.[11]à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  In the next Chapter of this paper, we will examine the problems for parties to insurance contracts which may arise as a result of under-subscribed slips. In order to gau ge the full extent of these problems it is first important to examine how the Courts have decided which measure of damages will be utilized to determine the extent of a brokers liability when he has either failed to fully subscribe a slip or has made a misrepresentation causing the slip to become under-subscribed. A key case for consideration on this point is that of Aneco Reinsurance Underwriting Ltd v Johnson Higgins [2001] UKHL 51. This case is highly complex, and for this reason the facts will be presented in numerical point form: Aneco Reinsurance Underwriting Ltd v Johnson Higgins [2001] UKHL 51 Mr. Bullen was an underwriter of four marine insurance syndicates at Lloyds of London, specializing in providing loss protection insurance to other marine insurers. Mr. Bullen asked Mr Forster, an insurance broker, to draft a treaty for the proportional reinsurance of his syndicates excess of loss account. Mr Forster drafted this treaty and approached Aneco Reinsurance Underwriting Ltd asking whether it would be prepared to take a share of this treaty. In a meeting held at Lloyds of London, Aneco Reinsurance Underwriting Ltds underwriter, Mr. Crawley, agreed to subscribe to between 3 and 3.5 units of the Bullen treaty on the condition that Mr. Forster was able to obtain appropriate excess of loss insurance for Aneco. In December 1988, Mr. Forster, acting on behalf of Aneco Reinsurance Underwriting Ltd contacted a leading Lloyds underwriter, Mr. King, to obtain quotations from the marine excess loss market. The slip in question was divided into 6 layers. After some negotiation, Mr. King made an offer for reinsurance which was acceptable to Mr. Forsters client. Mr. Forster therefore instructed Mr. King to go ahead and obtain the quoted reinsurance. Mr. Forster then proceeded to contact Mr. Crawley, informing him that, in total, he had managed to acquire 100% of subscriptions for three of the layers of the insurance, and was very close to securing 100% subscription for the other three layers. On the basis of this information, Mr. Crawley agreed to underwrite the policy. The Bullen treaty was a faculative/ obligatory treaty. What this means is that under the terms of the treaty, Mr. Bullen was entitled to choose which if any risks he would cede to the reinsurers, who were in turn obliged to accept any risks ceded. The proportion of the premium which would be payable to the reinsurers would therefore depend upon the amount of risk which had been ceded to them by Mr. Bullen, and was variable but proportional in this regard. However, Mr. Forster had failed to inform Mr. Crawford and Anecos reinsurers that the treaty was a faculative/ obligatory treaty. Rather, they were led to believe that the treaty was a standard quota share treaty. Understandably, some of Anecos reinsurers sought to avoid the policies, because their risk assessments had been made on the basis of them being entitled to reinsure a set proportion of every risk, rather than being only entitled to reinsure those risks which Mr. Bullens syndicates did not want to insure. As Lord Steyn remarked (at 26): à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“[Under a fac/oblig treaty] the reassured is able to put onto his reinsurer the least attractive pieces of qualifying business in his book, while keeping what he considers to be the best business for himself. A reinsurer will tend only to reinsure another underwriter on fac/oblig terms if he has considerable trust in the way that his reassured will use it. It is common ground, now, that Mr King would not have agreed to lead the reinsurance of a fac/oblig treaty, and that on a proper presentation of the risk, it would have been impossible to get enough underwriters to subscribe the reinsurance slip, so that the reinsurance that Mr Crawley desired was never available in the market.à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  Aneco Reinsurance Underwriting Ltd argued that if Mr. Forster had made all necessary enquiries and performed full disclosure he would have realized that Mr. Crawleys offer of reinsurance was not appropriate. As a result of Anecos reinsurers avoiding the policies, $11million of Anecos total loss under the Bullen treaty remained uninsured. In the High Court[12], Aneco sought damages in negligence for its actual losses of $11 million but also argued that it should be entitled to recover the $35 million, that sum being the full cost of its involvement in the Bullen Treaty. The commercial Court agreed that there had been material non-disclosure of facts amounting to negligence by Mr. Forster, and that Aneco was therefore entitled to recover its actual losses. The commercial court denied the claim for $35 million on the basis that, in its opinion, had Mr. Forster made all disclosures, it still would have been possible to secure reinsurance of those units of the treaty on similar terms. Aneco appealed this decision on the basis that the Commercial Court were wrong to hold that alternative reinsurance on similar terms would have been available had Mr. Forster performed his duties with the appropriate degree of care and skill[13]. While the Court of Appeal unanimously agreed that reinsurance upon similar terms would not have been possible if Mr. Forster had made full disclosure, there was still much debate over the correct measure of damages. Evans and Ward LJJ agreed that the correct measure was $35 million, whereas Aldous LJ believed that the duty of the brokers was too narrow to justify such an award being made. The case proceeded to the House of Lords, where the primary issue for determination was as follows: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Is the correct measure of damages all of Anecos losses under the Bullen treaty or is the correct measure equal to the recovery which Aneco would have made under the reinsurance contracts but was unable to make to the extent that those have been avoided?[14]à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  Lord Steyn, providing the leading judgement in this case, commenced his dictum with an analysis of the decision in the case of SAAMCO [1997] AC 191[15]. He quoted Lord Hoffman from this earlier case: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“It is that a person under a duty to take reasonable care to provide information on which someone else will decide upon a course of action is, if negligent, not generally regarded as responsible for all the consequences of that course of action. He is responsible only for the consequences of the information being wrong. A duty of care which imposes upon the informant responsibility for losses which would have occurred even if the information which he gave had been correct is not in my view fair and reasonable as between the parties. It is therefore inappropriate either as an implied term of a contract or as a tortious duty arising from the relationship between them.à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  From this dicta, Lord Steyn derived a distinction between a duty to provide correct informati on and the duty to provide sound advice; where only the former duty exists, then the informant should not be liable for all resulting losses; where the latter duty exists, then the advisor may be liable for all resultant losses. Lord Steyn argued that, in this case, there was direct evidence from the brokers themselves which suggested that they had advised Mr. Crawford (Anecos underwriter) on the correct course of action to take. On this basis, Lord Steyn rejected the appeal. Lord Slynn, Lord Browne-Wilkinson and Lord Lloyd of Berwick, concurred with the findings and ratio descendi of Lord Steyn. What can be gleaned from this case is that where an underwriter has been negligent in performing his or her duties, with the result that damage has been caused to his or her client, in order to assess the correct measure of damages, I.e. whether the injured party is entitled to reclaim all monies paid in respect of that insurance or is only entitled to reclaim its actual losses, it is important to ascertain whether or not the duty of the broker in the case, taking into account all of the circumstances surrounding the client broker relationship (and evidence thereof), was merely to provide to the client information upon which that client could base his or her own decision as to the most appropriate course of action, or was to advise the client as to the most appropriate course of action. From the dictum of Lord Steyn in this case, it is clear that the Courts will likely allow for full recovery when the duty owed by the broker is considered to fall within the latter category, and wil l likely allow only for limited (actual loss) recovery when the duty owed by the broker is considered to fall within the former category. What is not clear is the extent to which the decision in the case of Aneco Reinsurance Underwriting Ltd v Johnson Higgins [2001] UKHL 51 that the broker was providing advice to Mr. Crawford (Anecos underwriter) was based upon the fact that Mr. Forster, the brokering agent, admitted that he had provided Mr. Crawford with advice. For example, it is not clear whether or not, if this explicit evidence was lacking, the House would have come to the same conclusion. In some respects, one might argue that the evidence cited in this case was unreliable- there is a fine line between providing information and providing advice and it is not really fair to expect a broker to be an expert in making this distinction. In the opinion of this author, it was wrong for Lord Steyn to have placed so much emphasis on this piece of evidence. This author agrees with t he dictum of Lord Hoffman in this case, who stated, (at 62), commenting upon his own information/advice distinction, as derived from the case of South Australia Asset Management v York Montague Ltd. [1997] AC 191: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Lord Hoffmann drew a distinction between a duty to provide information for the purpose of enabling someone else to decide upon a course of action and a duty to advise someone as to what course of action he should take. [1997] AC 191, 214 This has been widely misunderstood. Lord Hoffmann was not distinguishing between a duty to provide information and a duty to give advice. That is a distinction without a difference, for the terms are interchangeable. He was distinguishing between a duty to provide particular information or advice on request and a duty to advise generally when it is left to the adviser to decide what matters he should consider. Even where the defendant assumes responsibility for advising generally whether or not a course of action should be taken it is still necessary to identify the particular course of action in question. Where the question is whether to enter into a particular transaction, it is necessary to identify the relevant transaction, for the defendant is not responsible for loss arising from any other transaction.à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  One would hope that future Courts pay homage to this useful and insightful contribution as obiter dictum, despite the fact that Lord Hoffman delivered a minority dissenting opinion in this case. Conclusions to Chapter 1: In this chapter we have examined how the Courts have traditionally dealt with liability for under subscription of insurance slips, whether by misrepresentation, negligence or otherwise. In particular we have examined how the Courts are increasingly willing to find duties of care between non-contracting parties to an insurance slip. Within the context of negligent disclosure or misrepresentation, we have seen how the Courts have started to move away from the pr inciples laid down in the Zephyr case towards the position that following underwriters are entitled to avoid policies on the basis of misrepresentations which were made to leading underwriters only. We have presented various reasons for why this development may not have been necessary, but have disengaged with this debate on the basis that the law now appears to be settled in this regard. Finally, in this chapter, we examined Lord Hoffmans information/ advice distinction which was recently applied in the case of Aneco Reinsurance Underwriting Ltd v Johnson Higgins [2001] UKHL 51 and argued that, while this distinction has often been misunderstood and misapplied (perhaps even in the Aneco case itself), it does provide a workable basis for deciding which measure of damages will be the most appropriate in each case. Taking into account these conclusions, in the next Chapter of this paper we will identify each of the potential parties to an insurance policy and identify the vario us problems that each party may face as a result of an insurance slip being under subscribed. Chapter 2: Let us commence this Chapter by identifying the various parties which can be affected by an under-subscribed insurance slip: (1) The Insured Party: The insured party may be an individual consumer or an individual commercial body, either seeking insurance or reinsurance if that commercial body is itself an insurer. Alternatively, the insured party may be a group of individuals or even a syndicate of companies. In light of the fact that the Financial Ombudsman Service only has jurisdiction to mediate disputes between consumers and companies regulated by the Financial Services Authority, for the purposes of this chapter we will treat consumer insured parties separately from non-consumer insured parties. (2) The Broker: The broker is a professional agent acting on behalf of the insured party to acquire quotations for insurance or reinsurance of a particular risk. (3) The Leading Underwriter: A leading underwriter manages a syndicate of Names. He or she represents these names by finding risks, a proportion of which his or her Names may wish to insure or reinsure. A leading underwriter is generally one who has real influence within his or her particular market sector. It is to leading underwriters that brokers will first bring their business as they know that if they can persuade a leading underwriter to underwrite the risk, then it will be easier to find other underwriters (following underwriters) to underwrite that risk also. The leading underwriter will invariably maintain close working relationships with many experienced brokers, and will base his decisions on an assessment of the actual risk to be insured/ reinsured. (4) The Following Underwriter: Like a leading underwriter, a following underwriter also manages a syndicate of Names but rather than being approached by a broker with a clean slip, will likely only be approached onc e a leading underwriter has already subscribed a part of that slip. Rather than performing an assessment of the risk insurable risk itself, the following underwriter will often base his or her decision to subscribe to the slip on the sole basis that an experienced leading underwriter with specialist knowledge in the relevant market sector has subscribed to that slip. (5) The Insurer/ Reinsurer The insurer is the party who agrees to accept a proportion of the total liability of the insurable risk in return for a proportion of the total premium payable by the insured party. A reinsurer is an insurer who has agreed to underwrite part of the risk held by an insurer. For example, as we discussed previously in the case of General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation and Others v Tanter and Others, the insurers of the Zephyr underwrote all of the risk, but the reinsurers underwrote the total loss risk on behalf of the insurers. Let us now examine the various problems which each of these parties may suffer as a result of an under subscribed slip, taking into account the current position of the law and/or the current approach of the Financial Ombudsman Service in dealing with such problems[16]: (1)(a) Consumer Insured Parties: A consumer insured party may not even know what a slip is, or that one exists in relation to their insurance policy. This is because consumers generally have not been educated on the intricate workings of the insurance market, unless they happen to work within this sector. In light of this, consumer insured parties are particularly vulnerable, being unaware of their legal rights and obligations under a slip and being unlikely to seek professional legal advice before selecting appropriate insurance brokers and entering into insurance agreements with leading underwriters. It is for this reason that the role of the Financial Ombudsman Service has been extended into the insurance sector. The Financial Ombudsman Service, upon receiving a complaint about an insurance company, is duty-bound to contact that company and inform it that a complaint has been made, setting out the grounds for that complaint in a clear and impartial way. The Financial Ombudsman Service will then give the company a chance to perform its own internal investigation and respond to the complaint. If the company is unable to settle the complaint, then the Financial Ombudsman who has been assigned to the case may take a more proactive role in mediating the dispute and helping both sides to reach an amicable settlement, although it insists that it always remains impartial throughout: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“We are not a regulator (watchdog) or a trade body or a consumer champion. Our role is to settle disputes, without taking sides. So when we look at a complaint, we give both sides a fair hearing. If a business isnt able to resolve a customerà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s complaint on its own, well see if we can help settle the dispute. But the business must first have the chance to sort things out itself.à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  In the context of under subscribed slips, the problems faced by consumers are the same regardless of the reasons for the under subscription- the insurers will refuse to settle all or part of a claim made by them against their insurance policy for an insurable risk. As we have discussed throughout Chapter 1 of this paper, invariably the reason that an insurer will try to avoid liability in this way is because it believes either that it was misrepresented as to the nature or scope of the risk or as to the total proportion of the risk that it would be liable for, or that the insured or the insureds broker failed to disclose all relevant material facts prior to entering into its contract of insurance. A consumer who faces this problem can submit his or her complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service. The first step in the approach that the Financial Ombudsman Service will adopt in deciding whether or not to supp ort the insurer(s) in avoiding the policy is to ask the following two questions: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“(1) When the customer sought insurance, did the insurer ask a clear question about the matter which is now under dispute? (2) Did the answer to that clear question induce the insurerÃÆ' Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ¾ that is, did it influence the insurerà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s decision to enter into the contract at all, or to do so under terms and conditions that it otherwise would not have accepted?[17]à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  If the answer to either question is no, then the Financial Ombudsman Service will not support the insurer. Some commentators have argued that this first-stage enquiry effectively eliminates the duty of disclosure on consumers: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Since a question is required before a policy can be avoided, this seems effectively to remove the duty of disclosure.[18]à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  If the answers to both of the questions are yes, then the Financial Ombudsman Service will perform an assessment of whether the consumer policyholder misled the insurer deliberately, recklessly, inadvertently or innocently. The definition of innocent within this context is non-contentious: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Customers act in good faith if their non-disclosure is made innocently. This may happen because the question is unclear or ambiguous, or because the relevant information is not something that they should reasonably know. In these cases, the insurer will not be able to à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"avoidà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ the contract and (subject to the policy terms and conditions) should pay the claim in full.[19]à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  In regard to reckless and inadvertent non-disclosure: The Financial Ombusdsman Services states: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“[T]he most difficult cases to determine involve distinguishing between behaviour that is merely careless [I.e. inadvertent] and that which amounts to recklessness. Both are forms of negligence. Inadvertence occurs when the customer unintentionally misleads the insu rer. This can occur just by failing to read and check the questions and answers thoroughly enough. When this happens there is no breach of the duty of utmost good faithCustomers will find it more difficult to prove that they acted inadvertently if they answered several questions badly. To get one or two questions wrong may be regarded as inadvertent; to get several wrong starts to look like recklessnessAn example of recklessness might be where a customer signs a blank proposal form and leaves it to be filled out by someone else. The customer has signed a declaration that à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"the above answers are true to the best of my knowledge and beliefà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢, but does not know what those answers will be.[20]à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  While the task of distinguishing between negligence by inadvertent non-disclosure and negligence by recklessness is simply a matter of degree, the latter category being reserved only for the more serious incidences of negligence, the remedies available t o a consumer within each category are very different. The remedy for inadvertent non-disclosure is a described by the Financial Ombudsman Service in the following terms: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Where there has been inadvertent non-disclosure or misrepresentation, we expect insurers to rewrite the insurance. This should be done on the terms they would originally have offered if they had been aware of all the information. In some cases this may result in a proportionate payment; in others it may result in no payment at all. This is because the inadvertently-withheld information would, if disclosed, have led to the firm declining the application altogether.[21]à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  However, there is no remedy available to a consumer for reckless non-disclosure, because the Financial Ombudsman Service considers this type of conduct to constitute a breach of duty of good faith. The fourth and final category of non-disclosure is deliberate non-disclosure, and in cases where the Financial Ombudsman S ervice believes a consumer deliberately misled an insurer through non-disclosure, it will allow the insurer to avoid the policy and may even support it in withholding the insurance premium: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“[T]his is a fraud and à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" strictly speaking à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" the insurance premium does not have to be returned.[22]à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  The first thing which is striking about this four-category approach is that it is heavily stacked in favour of the consumer, even allowing consumers a remedy in cases where they have been minorly negligent. It should be noted that if the insured is not happy with the outcome of the Ombudsman process, he or she is entitled to escalate the claim to the County Court. This process will be outlined in more detail in the following section of this chapter, which pertains to non-consumer insured parties. It should be noted that where the insurance agreement contains a warranty clause under which the insured warrants that all of the info rmation provided is 100% accurate, then if it later transpires that any of the information provided was incorrect, the insured will not be able to enforce the insurance policy. The problem for consumers is that there is a real risk that they will be unaware of this fact, not being expected to understand the differences in legal consequence between a warranty, a condition and any other clause. This means that insurers can use the warranty as a devise to try to avoid settling valid claims when they arise, by finding the most minute of discrepancies and arguing that a breach of warranty has occurred. This point will be discussed in greater length later in this chapter when we turn to discuss the practical ways that insurers can avoid insurance policies where there has been a misrepresentation or a breach of disclosure duty and also in Chapter 3 when we proffer proposals for reform. On one final point, it should be noted that s19 of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 states: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã… “Subject to the provisions of the preceding section as to circumstances which need not be disclosed, where an insurance is effected for the assured by an agent, the agent must disclose to the insurer (a) Every material circumstance which is known to himself, and an agent to insure is deemed to know every circumstance which in the ordinary course of business ought to be known by, or to have been communicated to, himà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  In practice this means that where a broker fails to relay all of the material information provided by his client to the insurers, then the insurers can avoid the insurance policy to the detriment of the insured, even though the insured may be wholly innocent of any wrongdoing. (1)(b) Non-Consumer Insured Parties: Non-consumer insured parties may not utilize the Financial Ombudsman Service in order to avoid the problems of under-subscribed slips. Rather, this group must rely upon the law to bring a claim in negligence against the party or parties res ponsible for the under-subscription. The insured party will only be able to mount a successful claim where the risk in question is an insurable risk, and it did not misrepresent the insurer or breach its duty of disclosure prior to entering into the insurance contract. As we have discussed previously in this paper, the burden of proof is on the insurer to show that, on the balance of probabilities, the insured party did mislead it by misrepresentation or non-disclosure. Where the insured party is wholly innocent, then the law will either prevent the insurers from avoiding the policy (as in the final hearing of the Zephyr case) or, if the reason for the avoidance is due to a misrepresentation or breach of duty having been made by the insurance broker, will order the broker to pay damages to the insured. In this latter circumstance, whether or not the broker will be liable to repay the premium to the insured party, in full, will depend upon the nature of the relationship betw een the broker and the insured party. As we saw from our analysis of the case of Aneco Reinsurance Underwriting Ltd v Johnson Higgins [2001] UKHL 51 the appropriate test in these circumstances is that proffered by Lord Hoffman in the case of South Australia Asset Management v York Montague Ltd. [1997] AC 191; namely, the information/ advice distinction test. In essence, where the broker was responsible not merely for providing information but also for providing advice to the client as the the most appropriate course of action, then that broker may be found liable for all of the losses which resulted from that advice proving to be negligent. However, where the broker was only guilty of providing erroneous information, then as long as there is no direct causal link between that incidence of negligence and the total loss suffered, then the broker will only be liable to compensate the insured party the same amount of money which it lost as a result of an insurer (or multiple insurers) avoiding the policy. Where it can be proven on the balance of probabilities that the insured party misrepresented the insurer, either recklessly or fraudulently, then the insured party will have no remedy against an insurer seeking to avoid an insurance policy. Where it can be shown that on the balance of probabilities, the insured party negligently executed his disclosure duties, then there may be no remedy as the Courts may allow the insurer(s) to avoid the policy completely. However, a body of jurisprudence has been developed to set out the rules of when an insurer will be entitled to avoid a policy because of the non-disclosure of the insured party. One rule which applies to non-consumer insured parties only is that the duty of disclosure extends to disclosing all material facts, even where the insurer did not ask the insured any questions relevant to those facts. For example, section 18(1) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 states: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“[T]he assured must disc lose to the insurer, before the contract is concluded, every material circumstance which is known to the assured, and the assured is deemed to know every circumstance which, in the ordinary course of business, ought to be known by him. If the assured fails to make such disclosure, the insurer may avoid the contract.à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  This might be seen to impose an undue burden on non-consumer insured parties who, as Clarke (2005) notes: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“may complete the form with scrupulous care, but still find that there was something else material to prudent insurers which, apparently, the particular insurer did not think to ask about but which, nonetheless, the applicant was expected to think of and disclose.[23]à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  This having been said, it is now clear that the law is unprepared to allow insurers to avoid insurance policies either where the insurer knew that the facts provided by the insured were untrue at the time of agreeing to provide insurance[24], or where the insurers had failed to ask the right questions before entering into a policy agreement[25]. Some commentators have suggested that it may be appropriate in cases where both the insurer and the insured are in breach of their respective obligations to utilize the doctrine of contributory negligence to apportion the loss between the parties and reduce the settlement owed by the insurer to the insured accordingly. For example, in the North Star Shipping case, Lord Justice Longmore advocated such an approach, arguing that: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“[While] it would, of course, lead to some uncertainty the concept of contributory negligence is a concept that has worn the test of time very well. In these days when the incidence of costs in litigation may depend on well or ill informed guesses made by the litigant, at the time they are obliged to serve pre action protocols, uncertainty is endemic, yet the court, and litigants, are quite good at getting used to it.[26]à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  It should b e noted however, that a breach of warranty will void the insurance policy, so where the insured has warranted that all information provided is correct, then it will not be able to enforce the insurance policy regardless of the reasons or motivations for that breach. The law pertaining to breach of warranties will be discussed in the following section of this chapter. (3) The Leading Underwriter and Insurers: The leading underwriter receives information directly from the insured partys broker and possibly also from the insured party directly, on behalf of his syndicate of insurers. Therefore, it is very important that the leading underwriter, on behalf of his syndicate, takes all reasonable steps to ensure that he meets his obligations to (i) make sure that none of the facts provided by the insured are known to be incorrect; and, (ii) ask of the insured all questions which will be relevant to making an accurate assessment of the insurable risk. In this way, the leading underwri ter can protect his syndicate, as far as possible, from innocent non-disclosure by the insured. However, as we have seen from our earlier analysis, even in cases where an insured party recklessly fails to disclose material information, insurers may not be entitled to avoid their liabilities completely. With this concern in mind, one of the practical ways that a leading underwriter can ensure that his syndicate of insurers are able to avoid a policy, completely, if it later transpires that the insured misrepresented the relevant facts and/or did not disclose all material facts prior to entering into the insurance policy, is to employ warranty clauses within the insurance agreement. The definition of a warranty and the rule that a warranty must be complied with is provided by section 33 of the Marine Insurance Act 1906, which states: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“A warranty means a promissory warranty, that is to say, a warranty by which the assured undertakes that some particular thing shall or shall not be done, or that some condition shall be fulfilled, or whereby he affirms or negatives the existence of a particular state of facts.A warranty, as above defined, is a condition which must be exactly complied with, whether it be material to the risk or not. If it be not so complied with, then, subject to any express provision in the policy, the insurer is discharged from liability as from the date of the breach of warranty, but without prejudice to any liability incurred by him before that date.à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  What this means is that if an underwriter includes a warranty clause into the insurance agreement on behalf of his insurer(s), stating that the insured warrants that he, she or it has accurately disclosed a particular piece or class of information, then if it later transpires that the insured failed to so disclose that information, the insurer will be able to avoid any liability under that insurance policy if a claim is made by the insured. By virtue of section 34(2) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906[27], this is true even if the insured manages to remedy the breach prior to making a claim, unless the insurer agrees to waive the warranty clause[28]. The strict application of this ancient rule can be seen in the case of De Hahn v Hartley (1786) 1 TR 343. In this case the insured provided a warranty that the ship in question would have 50 hands on board when it set sail from Liverpool. In fact, there were only 46 hands on board the ship during this journey. When the insured tried to settle a claim with the insurer the insurer avoided liability on the grounds that the insured had breached his warranty. It was irrelevant that there was no relationship between the damage being claimed for and the number of hands on board the ship[29]! The English and Scottish Law Commissions (2006) (at page 8) have criticized the law on warranties, providing a shocking example of how insurers have, in the past, used a breach of warranty to avoid liability : à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“[I]n Dawson Ltd v Bonnin [1922] 2 AC 413, the insured was asked where a lorry was garaged. They inadvertently gave the firms place of business in centra

Marriage in Culture Practice and Meaning Across Diverse...

Marriage refers to a legal union between a man and a woman, where they become a wife and husband. A family refers to a social unit that consists of children and their parents. Divorce, on the other hand, is the dissolution of a marriage by a court of law or any other competent body. Explore the Variations of Marriage in Different Cultures Marriage is an institution that has formed the foundation of families throughout history. However, the traditions that surround marriage ceremonies, choosing a marriage partner, as well as the obligations and rights of marriage differ from one culture to another. In most cultures, religion endorses monogamous and heterosexual marriages. This is a marriage that involves persons of the opposite gender,†¦show more content†¦In most societies, a husband had legal ownership and management of the personal property of his wife. The Hispanic tradition permitted women to own property (Deere, 2001). Married women in this tradition could manage and control their property, and that of their husbands. Further, the tradition allowed women to will and inherit property. In case the husband died or they separated, women in this tradition had permission to keep the property they had brought into the union. In addition, they had authorit y to keep half of the marital property. In earlier times of the United States of America husbands controlled their wives property. However, by the early 1900s most states had allowed married women to control property. Some acts that required men to have their wives signatures on any deeds to her property before selling came up (Deere, 2001). Across the world, some cultures that still deny women equal inheritance rights. This is in addition to an equal share, of matrimonial property. These are cultures are of the idea that only a man can own and administer property. Exploring Compassionate and Arranged Marriages A compassionate marriage is one founded on the basis of mutual feelings and respect. On the other hand, an arranged marriage is one agreed and planned by the guardians or families of the concerned couple. Historically, arranged marriages were a way of solidifying the relationship thatShow MoreRelatedHow Socialization Is Defined As The Process Of Learning And Internalizing The Values, And Gender Roles Essay1415 Words   |  6 Pagesand norms of our own social group. As a result of socialization, one then becomes a functioning member of society. Family is one of the groups that provide structured situations where socialization occurs. Family is the main agent of socialization where language, values, and gender roles are first learned. The Census Bureau defines family as two or more individuals related by blood, marriage, or adoption living in one household. However, sociologists have defined family as a social group whose membersRead More Asdfghjkl894 Words   |  4 PagesSocial Movements * Community and Urban Sociology * Comparative and Historical Sociology * Sociology and Computers * Crime, Law amp; Deviance * Economic Sociology * Environment amp; Technology * Family amp; Marriage * History of Sociology * International Migration * Latino/a Sociology * Marxist Sociology * Mathematical Sociology * Medical Sociology * Organizations, Occupations, amp; Work * Peace, War, amp; SocialRead MoreReligion, Politics And Society : Israel1108 Words   |  5 PagesSocial Justice 12 Religion, Politics and Society: Israel Milad Zamany April, 12th, 2016 To begin, the country we chose to do our research one was Israel, because of it vast religious affiliation amidst the religious groups within its borders. Israel is comprised of a major part of the Holy Land, a region of significant importance to all Jews, Christians, Muslims, Druze and Baha’is within Israel. Firstly, the Israeli system of government is based on a parliamentary democracy. The prime ministerRead MoreThe Meaning Of Conceptualization Of Beauty1687 Words   |  7 PagesMorgan Kilmartin Fall 2016 The Meaning Of†¦ Conceptualization of Beauty The term beautiful first appears in the English language around the 14th century with the use of the word â€Å"beaute† in Middle English, derived from the Anglo-French â€Å"beau† with roots in the Latin â€Å"bellus†. The common usage of the term connotes both â€Å"having qualities of beauty† and â€Å"exciting aesthetic pleasure† (Merriam-Webster, 2016). The semantic reference to aesthetics in the term highlights the Greek and Roman influence onRead MoreWhere Are You From? What Language Do You Speak?1665 Words   |  7 PagesWhere are you from? What language do you speak? How were you raised? How does all of those questions reflect a person? Everything that society does today influences our everyday lives. Everyone comes from different places of the world and speak different languages. The world is so diverse and filled with many different cultures that many don’t know all them. Here, in the United States, our ethnicity is classified as : White Americans, American Indians, African American, Hispanics, and Asian. AroundRead MoreIs India A Country Of Ethnic Religious And Linguistic Pluralism Par Excellence?1364 Words   |  6 Pagesmaintained this special and unique character since ancient times to the present day. It ethnically-diverse population has affiliations with Aryans, Greeks, Mongols, Arabs, Turks, Afghans and others as well as peoples of Central Asia. This ethnic diversity is clearly reflected on the characteristics of Indians and the culture, as a whole, in the region. Therefore, one must wonder how all this diversity in culture and beliefs changed the concept of religion, and how did It contribute to the creation of otherRead MoreDifferences Between Christianity And Islam2708 Words   |  11 PagesReligious Differences in Marriage From the past to the present, society has valued the partnership between two people and a spiritual God and/or leader. The unique union/partnership, also known as marriage, has been and continues to be a practice among religions of all kinds. The one common trait that each religion shares is the spiritual agreement and commitment to promise one’s self to another person forever in sickness and in health. Although the basic idea of marriage is shared, many religionsRead MoreThe Cultural Identity Of The African American Community1653 Words   |  7 Pagesand more often than not, these multiple identities intersect with blackness. Being that American society has deemed colored people and populations as minoritarian subjects, African diaspora people can be seen making safe spaces for themselves to survive as individuals and as a part of communities. Stuart Hall’s Cultural Identity and Diaspora focuses on the current issues of identity, cultural practices and cultural representations. He analyses the visual representations of Afro-Caribbean’s and challengesRead MoreThe Founding Years Of America1692 Words   |  7 Pages Universities were obliged to improve educational opportunities of groups who have experienced prejudice in the past, though a practice called Affirmative Action. The Civil Rights Act was created in 1964 to prohibit discrimination against race, color, religion, or origin in order to create a fair nation. The practice was broken down by Webster Dictionary as the â€Å"practice of improving the educational and job oppurtunities of†¦ groups that have not been treated fairly in the past† (Kaufman and Smitherman)Read MoreHow Globalization Affects The Youth?2050 Words   |  9 Pagesthey want even if it is halfway across the country. If you want to know what the latest trend in Paris is or how the economy of china is doing, you can easily acces this information. In today’s generation, connections across the world can be made in a matter of milliseconds. The interconnectedness of the world, a result of globalization, has proven to be beneficial for the world’s citizens. People from all corners of the Earth can communicate and spread ideas, culture and more. This exposure to life